This is the first post on my new blog.
The Long Embrace by Judith Freeman
The Long Embrace: Raymond Chandler and the Woman He Loved by Judith Freeman
I took a great fiction class from Judith Freeman at USC, and I got to hear about some of the travails involved in getting this book finished, so when I happened across a copy in the bookstore this past week I was eager to check it out. It’s a quirky sort of biography — the book recounts Judith’s own present-day pilgrimage to each of Chandler’s more than twenty L.A. residences, and along the way she fills us in on what was going on in Chandler’s life when he lived at each address. The book focuses particularly on the relationship between Chandler — an alcoholic oil company executive who turned to writing fiction while in his fifties — and his wife Cissy, who left her husband to marry Chandler, and who lied to Chandler about her age. (She claimed to be eight years older than him when actually she was eighteen years older.)
I couldn’t put the book down. In fact, I started reading it outside the bookstore and then kept reading it for over an hour as I walked home. I’ve never walked and read at the same time before, but it’s a lot of fun. You can actually walk and read pretty easily in Santa Monica because the sidewalks are straight and flat, and since everyone in L.A. drives, the sidewalks are almost completely deserted. (It’s actually quieter on the sidewalks than it is in my apartment.)
Here’s a section of the book that particularly struck me: “[Chandler] read Hammett and Hemingway, attracted by the swiftness and simplicity of their prose, the clean, sharp sentences and the cool, hard surface of the masculine world they depicted. Hemingway and Hammett: each in his own way understanding the need for terseness and direct forcefulness, for a prose of terrible urgency. From Hemingway Chandler learned to keep his sentences short and swift–sometimes very short, and very swift, as in ‘He drank.’ Or, ‘He sat.’ From Hammett he took the detective, a hardened hero like Sam Spade. But whereas Hammett had simply described the lone man walking in the rain, Chandler made us hurt for that man. His lonely man was more likeable than Spade, less harsh and brittle, more human. He exposed the man’s wounds, his longings, his fears, and the biggest wound of all was the man’s haunting, endemic, incurable, ever-present loneliness. An existential separation oozed from the writer, like something dark seeping from an unseen place. It takes an existentialist to know one, and Chandler was our first, our best, our homegrown existentialist, admired even by Camus. Ray took something else from Hammett: a sense of the wisecracking humor of The Thin Man, which came out the year Ray published his first story. His Marlowe owes a lot to Nick Charles — the cool, suave, imperturbable cosmopolitan who tosses back his first drink with breakfast and keeps going to midnight and somehow never gets a hangover but just grows wittier and more clever as the day wears on. In some ways, Marlowe was Nick without Nora, the more streetwise Angeleno version of the more effete San Fransiscan, but what connected these characters was the love of the bon mot, the fast repartee, and a good manly capacity for liquor. Neither Hammett nor Chandler was particularly good at depicting crowd scenes. They focused on the intimate one-on-one. Chandler once said he could never manage a roomful of people in his fiction, but give him two people snotting at each other over a desk and he was a happy man.”
And this, from one of Chandler’s letters to his editor, Blanche Knopf: “I’m afraid the book [The High Window] is not going to be any good to you. No action, no likeable characters, no nothing. The detective does nothing … all I can say by way of extenuation is that I tried my best … the thing that rather gets me down is that when I write something that is tough and fast and full of mayhem and murder, I get panned for being tough and fast and full of mayhem and murder, and then when I try to tone down a bit and develop the mental and emotional side of a situation, I get panned for leaving out what I was panned for putting in the first time … From now on, if I make mistakes, as I no doubt shall, they will not be made in a futile attempt to avoid making mistakes.”
My Friend Andrea Kail Stops a Mugging
Hey, my friend Andrea stopped a mugging. Badass.
Intergalactic Medicine Show Interviews James Morrow
Intergalactic Medicine Show interviews James Morrow
Among contemporary writers, James Morrow is one of the most intelligent, most imaginative, and also one of the funniest. In this new interview he discusses his most recent novel, The Last Witchfinder, which is about one woman’s crusade to bring down the 1604 Witchcraft Statute of James I and help usher in the Age of Reason.
Here’s one interesting bit: “Yes, there is also some demonology in the Old Testament, but we find it largely in the famous translation authorized by James I, who fancied himself an expert demonologist, even wrote a book on the subject. The King James Bible was translated by witch believers, and this state of mind influenced many of their word choices. Think about that notorious line from Exodus, ‘Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.’ Today a Hebrew scholar would translate it in much more innocuous terms. It would come out something like, ‘Thou shalt not provide a fortune-teller with his means of livelihood.'”
Online Now: “Speculative Fiction: The Next Generation”
The article “Speculative Fiction: The Next Generation” by John Joseph Adams, which originally appeared in Novel & Short Story Writer’s Market and which draws from interviews with me, Tobias S. Buckell, Tim Pratt, and Cherie Priest, is now available online. See also the complete interview with me.
Happy New Year
Dinner Thursday
I’m flying back to LA on Friday. I’ll be getting together with some friends tomorrow night, details TBD, but probably in midtown/the village around 7:30-8, so if you’d like to come bid me adieu, shoot me an email and I’ll keep you posted on how plans shape up.
New Year’s Eve
My buddy Rob is throwing a New Year’s Eve party in my honor, so if you know me and if you’re going to be in the vicinity of Greenwich Village that evening and if you think you might want to stop by, email me for directions.
Advertisers Get Out Of My Head!!!
Advertisers get out of my head!!!
Just now I awoke and, bleary-eyed, browsed the internet. I saw an ad out of the corner of my eye, and my first reaction was, “You have got to be kidding me. Worst cross-promotion EVER.” Then I looked again and saw that it had just been my imagination — an imagination utterly corrupted and co-opted by decades of relentless corporate advertising.
Anyway, the actual ad looked like this:

But at first what I saw was this:

My Birthday at KGB
Thanks to everyone who wished me Happy Birthday on Wednesday. Conveniently enough, this year my birthday fell on the same night as KGB, so I had a ready-made party where I got to see a lot of my New York friends who I haven’t seen in a while. Here’s a photo from the evening, taken by Ellen Datlow:

Recommended: Wastelands: Stories of the Apocalypse, edited by John Joseph Adams
![]() |
Congrats to my buddy John Joseph Adams on the release of his big new anthology project Wastelands: Stories of the Apocalypse, which features contributions by writers such as Octavia E. Butler, Orson Scott Card, Jonathan Lethem, George R. R. Martin, Stephen King, and Gene Wolfe, and which just got a great review on the Beam Me Up podcast, who stated that Wastelands is “damn close” to being in the same league as Dangerous Visions. Whoa. |
Nice Note
I got a nice note from my friend Amy, who writes, “While cleaning out my closet, I found an old issue of Merlyn’s Pen from when I was in high school. And it turned out to have a story by you in it! (“Pomegranate Heart.”) The funny thing was, I actually remembered the story from when I read it when I was 15. So I guess it was pretty good :).”
Atheists in American Media
I had kind of an interesting conversation with my mom after I posted a link to the clip of Richard Dawkins & Douglas Adams. My mom said, “Who was that other guy in the clip? Dworkins?” I said, “Dawkins. He’s the world’s most famous atheist.” My mom said, “Wait, who’s the one who’s the really aggressive, wild-eyed, extremist atheist?” I said, “Um, yeah, that’s him.” My mom said, “That’s him? Really? He seems pretty mild-mannered in that clip.” I said, “Yeah, actually he is pretty mild-mannered.” My mom said, “So why does he have such a reputation for being so extreme?” I said, “I don’t know. That’s the American media, I guess.” So I was thinking about that, and seriously, in order for a religious figure to get labeled “extremist” or “militant” by the American media, that person has to blow up a lot of people, or at least threaten to do so with some credibility. But apparently all it takes for an atheist public figure to get labeled “extremist” or “militant” is for that person to robustly defend his beliefs and maybe occasionally employ a sarcastic or condescending tone of voice.
It was the same thing with Michael Newdow, the guy who went to the Supreme Court over the words “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance. I thought he had a pretty decent case, since Supreme Court precedent stated that Congress could not pass laws for the express purpose of “promoting religion,” and when Congress passed that law they stated in the record that “We’re passing this law in order to promote religion.” But whatever. What really struck me was that within minutes of the story breaking in the media, Michael Newdow’s phone was ringing off the hook with death threats, and yet all the media coverage was about what a fanatical wacko he was.
EDIT: It just occurred to me that Phillip Pullman always gets described as a “militant” atheist too. You’d think he was muling suitcase bombs on behalf of AUSCS. Seriously, he’s just a professor who writes books, and they’re fiction books for children. Get a grip, people.
Movie Review: I Am Legend
* * SPOILERS FOR I AM LEGEND * *
I Am Legend is one of my favorite books. It’s a compact, harrowing vision of utter loneliness in a hostile world (something author Matheson also captured brilliantly in his novel The Shrinking Man), and its conclusion is memorable and thought-provoking. I had basically given up all hope of the movie being anything other than mindless entertainment when I heard that Akiva Goldsman (who is mediocrity made flesh, and who previously travestized another old favorite of mine, Asimov’s I, Robot) was involved. I was still hoping the movie would at least be entertaining, and it is for about two-thirds of its running time, carried by terrific performances by Will Smith and his dog. (The dog is genuinely talented; I wish the dog had written the screenplay.) Unfortunately, the final act is filmmaking that’s as bad as any I’ve ever been subjected to. Not only is absolutely everything about the final half hour of the movie absurd, incompetent, and feebleminded, but, as was exactly the case with the I, Robot adaptation, the movie replaces the thought-provoking theme of the book with a cliche theme that makes exactly the opposite point as the book, and that is exactly the sort of reflexive witlessness that the book was written to critique in the first place. I also may have a new candidate for stupidest movie line of all time (replacing Starship Troopers‘ “I don’t mind that I was eviscerated by a giant beetle because at least I got to have sex with you first” — that’s a paraphrase), which is when the miraculous and ludicrous female survivor tells Will Smith, “I know there’s a colony of survivors living in the mountains of Vermont. How? God told me.” She quickly adds, “I know how that sounds,” to which I was unable to restrain myself from remarking aloud, “Yeah, like bad writing.” The last act of the movie is so nauseatingly terrible that it casts a cloud over the whole thing, unfortunately. The first two thirds are rather enjoyable, so if you see this movie I urge you in the strongest possible terms to leave the theater/kill your DVD player as soon as Will Smith drives to the pier at night. It’s at that point that the movie suffers the most precipitous decline in quality of any movie I can think of.
YouTube Links: Richard Dawkins & Douglas Adams, Lovecraft on Mastermind
Madeleine L’Engle Event
Hey, I’m back in New York now. I was thinking about going to see:
Charlotte Jones Voiklis, the granddaughter of Madeleine L’Engle, reads from A Wrinkle in Time and talks about her grandmother’s life and work. Anyone interested in joining me?
Spit
This evening, as I was sitting out on the 3rd Street Promenade having a snack, a crazy-looking guy walked past me, glared, and spat on the ground at my feet. I was like: Whoa, what did I do? Then later I saw him on the sidewalk and noticed that it wasn’t just me — he was spitting at every single person who walked past. So then I felt better.
Opera Singer
A nicely-dressed, nearly-spherical gentleman just walked past my apartment singing opera at the top of his lungs, and he was pretty good. Made me think of this.
I Dream of Dragons
So I stumbled across I Dream of Dragons, the blog of aspiring fantasy writer Bryan Hitchcock, who has some nice things to say about some of my stories.
On “Save Me Plz”: “Kirtley wrote one of my favorite Realms of Fantasy stories, ‘Blood of Virgins,’ and I was thrilled when that one was picked up by Escape Pod. ‘Save Me Plz’ is a riff on life with a video game addict. There was a lot here that rang true, since me and my whole family basically are WoW players, though I have managed to limit my addiction to Friday nights…. mostly. The thing I enjoyed most about this story was the way it kept unfolding and revealing layers of meaning and turns in the plot. Sure there are always going to be questions and places where the explanations run thin in a story that starts so small and becomes so epic. But, for the most part, the gaming issues rang true and the relationship was realistic. Mur‘s reading was excellent. I think her gaming background helped her make some really good choices for emphasis and emotion. I really enjoyed this story. A+”
On “The Second Rat”: “Wow. My favorite short stories are ones with a different twist to them that somehow make the reader appreciate life in a new and profound way. This was a story like that. I don’t want to give much away, but the basic idea is about a guy who can ‘rewind’ time and live parts of his life over again, and again, and again, if he wishes. This story blew my mind. So far, Kirtley is 3 for 3 with me. He writes stories that matter in the way I want my stories to matter.”
And finally on “The Disciple”: “A good spooky story about a man who is driven by his own losses and sense of mediocrity to pursue powers that ‘man was not meant to meddle in.’ Great twist at the end. Excellent buildup and homage to Lovecraft.” This blogger also notes that, “This guy is becoming one of my favorite short story writers.”
Thanks, Bryan. Coincidentally, you are now becoming one of my favorite bloggers.
YouTube Links: Catfight!, Ryan vs. Dorkman
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- …
- 64
- Next Page »